A Case on Restrictive Covenants

25th March 2013
A Case on Restrictive Covenants image

A Case on Restrictive Covenants

Employment Contracts often contain what are known as restrictive covenants.  Businesses seek to impose such restrictive covenants in order to try and prevent or limit a departing employee from doing such things as setting up in competition, working for a competitor, enticing away staff and soliciting customers and suppliers.

The restrictive covenant must be reasonable, in that it can only go so far as reasonably protecting a legitimate interest of the business and should not be used to stop departing members of staff from working.  As a result it is always important to get legal advice on such clauses, to try and ensure that they are reasonable or otherwise if they are found to be unreasonable then they will be void and have no effect whatsoever. 

An interesting case on restrictive covenants from the end of last year (2012) was Pat Systems –v- Neilly, which was determined by the High Court. 

Mr Neilly joined Pat Systems in 2000 as a junior salesman.  His original contract included a restrictive covenant stating that for twelve months after leaving the company he could not join a competitor.  In 2005 Mr Neilly was promoted to director of global accounts, a senior position.  Upon promotion he signed a letter that increased his salary and notice period.  The letter also included an acknowledgement that all other terms and conditions in his contract would remain unaltered.

In 2012 Mr Neilly resigned giving three months’ notice, and informed Pat Systems that he intended joining a company that Pat Systems regarded as a competitor. 

In response Pat Systems dismissed him without notice for a serious anticipatory breach of contract. 

The High Court considered that at the time Mr Neilly entered the contract in 2000 that it was quite clearly the case that the clause was void as it was unreasonable to impose a 12 month restriction on a junior salesman. 

However Pat Systems argued that the contract had been entered into in 2005 when Mr Neilly got promoted, upon the basis of his acknowledgement that all other terms remained unchanged. 

The High Court ruled that an acknowledgement was insufficient, and that Mr Neilly either needed to sign a new contract (including the covenant) or he needed to sign a fresh indication of acceptance of the existing covenant.

Daven Naghen, head of our Employment Team commented as follows:-

“This highlights the need for businesses to ensure that employees sign a new contract every time there is a change in role or a promotion.  Had Pat Systems done so in 2005 when Mr Neilly was promoted, then this probably would have prevented Mr Neilly from joining a competitor for 12 months as a 12 month restriction would probably have been deemed reasonable for the position he had acquired in 2005.”

If you need advice on restrictive covenants or any issues in respect of drafting contracts then please contact Daven Naghen on 01775 722261 or email daven.naghen@maplessolicitors.com or write to Dav at 23 New Road, Spalding, Lincolnshire PE11 1DH.

Maples supporting Macmillan Coffee Morning image

Maples supporting Macmillan Coffee Morning

On 29th September 2017 Maples Solicitors LLP will be hosting a coffee morning as part of Macmillan’s “World’s Biggest Coffee Morning”.

Tea, coffee and cakes will be served from 10:00am until 1:00pm and all donations received will go to Macmillan Cancer Support to assist them with providing medical, emotional, practical and financial support to those facing cancer and their families.

At the same time, Maples will also be running a free Wills, Lasting Powers of Attorney and Probate clinic so that whilst you are in the office you may take the opportunity to discuss any of these with one of the Private Client Team with no obligation to commit. You can use the time to raise any questions you may have about making a Will, who you could appoint as Executors, whether you need a Power of Attorney or how a Power of Attorney works, for example.

Maples hope to see their existing clients join them for the coffee morning and very much look forward to meeting new people- everyone is welcome!

If you would like to discuss any matters in relation to Wills, Lasting Powers of Attorney or any Probate related matters prior to the coffee morning then please contact one of the lawyers in our private client team:-

Jane Mawer- jane.mawer@maplessolicitors.com
Jamie Dobbs- jamie.dobbs@maplessolicitors.com
Faye Blair- faye.blair@maplessolcitors.com

Or telephone the office on 01775 722261 and ask to speak with one of the team.

Read More


Gemma Mayer LLB

"I would highly recommend Maples Solicitors, especially Gemma Mayer, for any conveyancing work. The level of support and professionalism was excellent at all times. I also felt if I needed to ask or clarify anything that it was not an issue. Buying and selling a house is stressful enough, but Gemma helped me through it step by step."

Anita Toal LLB BA

"I think you are brilliant. You can use my comments above. You are efficient, friendly and quite clearly very good at what you do. Mainly you don’t leave people hanging around too long for." "So easy to talk to her and she understood what I wanted. She put me at ease and I cant thank her enough"

Daven Naghen LLB

"I felt the service I got from Maples was excellent and was very honest all through the process. I would recommend Maples as a first class Solicitors group"

Faye Blair LLB

Faye was excellent, sensitive and acted very well to the time constraints we faced. Great service and dealt with compassion at such sad times made the process less painful very professional.

Jamie Dobbs ACILEx

Over the last forty years I have cause to deal with many law firms both in a personal and professional capacity, including some ‘top’ London Companies. In all of those dealings I have never found anyone as proactive and so willing to offer help and advice as Jamie Dobbs. During the last two years Jamie guided my parents through the completion of Lasting Powers of Attorney. Helped myself with the use of the LPA and recently dealing with Probate and Estate Administration following their death.

Mike Pepper MA

This is the second time we have used Mike Pepper at Maples Solicitors in the sale of our house. We cannot praise Mike enough for the highly efficient and professional service that he has provided us with. He is by far the best solicitor we have ever worked with, and the service that he has provided us with has gone far and beyond anything we have ever experienced. We have found the whole process to be a very relaxing experience.

Claire Smith FCILEx

Claire Smith has been amazing in every way. I highly recommend her and I am so grateful for all her help. She’s professional on all levels, reliable, extremely organised and I will be recommending her to everyone. I’m very lucky to have had her representing me and I can’t thank her enough. She is an asset to Maples. Thanks so much Claire!

Anita Zaborniak

We found it a pleasure to deal with Anita Zaborniak, she was most helpful and informative and kept us up to date with the progress of the purchase of our new home. If we were to move again we wouldn’t hesitate to use Maples again.