Withdrawing Dismissals – case authority

25th August 2010
Withdrawing Dismissals – case authority image

Withdrawing Dismissals – case authority

There are many instances of employers purporting to dismiss employees and then looking to withdraw or retract the dismissal. A recent case of Willoughby (W) –v- CF Capital Plc (CFC) provided some further legal guidance on this subject.

W was told by her manager that CFC was experiencing difficulties, and that one way to avoid redundancies was for staff to become self-employed on a retainer plus commission basis.  W expressed an interest in this option and requested more information.  After repeated requests for paperwork, W eventually received on 23rd December an agency agreement to effect the move to self-employed status. The agreement stated that her existing employment would end on 31st December.

W took legal advice and informed CFC that she declined the agency agreement.  On 5th January W’s manager rang her to say that there had been a misunderstanding and that if she did not want to become self-employed that she could continue in her employment.

W maintained that she had been dismissed and claimed wrongful and unfair dismissal.  CFC denied that there was a dismissal and claimed that W had resigned.

The Employment Tribunal (ET) found that the letter from CFC ‘without more’ amounted to a dismissal.  However the ET found ‘special circumstances’, as W’s manager had genuinely believed that W had agreed to become self-employed, and the dismissal was withdrawn as soon as practicable after W had alerted them to the mistake.  The ET held that W had resigned, having refused the explanation of the situation and offers to continue to employ her.  W appealed.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) allowed her appeal!  They said the ET had failed to ask whether ‘in the special circumstances’, W was entitled to assume that the decision to dismiss her was a conscious, rational decision.  In other words, was there anything to indicate to W that the words of dismissal were not to be taken at face value?

The EAT noted that the main practical problem addressed by ‘special circumstances’ had been words spoken in the heat of the moment and then quickly retracted.

On the basis of the ET’s findings that the reference to termination in the letter was intentional, not an error, W was entitled to assume that this was a conscious rational decision and to consider that her employment had ended.  Further the EAT held the Tribunal was wrong to hold that the withdrawal of the dismissal was timeous.  For a clearly expressed dismissal to be retracted it must be done quickly, usually within a day or two.  In this case the period was much longer and the Christmas holiday period was no excuse.

Daven Naghen, head of our Employment Team commented as follows:-

“This ruling may have been harsh on the employer, but shows that the employer must take great care in these matters.  An employer is only likely to be able to retract a dismissal if it was say made in the heat of the moment and the retraction is made almost instantly within no more than a couple of days at most.  If an employer notifies an employee in writing of a dismissal it will have great difficulties in retracting the dismissal as a written letter could suggest that the employer has made a conscious and rational decision to dismiss.

Subsequently a dismissal which cannot be retracted may lead to a claim by the employee for wrongful dismissal and or unfair dismissal.”

If you need advice on this subject matter then please email daven.naghen@maplessolicitors.com or telephone Dav on 01775 722261.


Who Will You Be Entrusting With Your Conveyancing? image

Who Will You Be Entrusting With Your Conveyancing?

WHO WILL YOU BE ENTRUSTING WITH YOUR CONVEYANCING WORK?  THE CHOICE IS YOURS!

Are the selling agents or perhaps the mortgage broker pushing or trying to persuade you to use a particular conveyancing firm? If so, we would strongly recommend that you ask the following pertinent questions so that, armed with all relevant facts, you are better able to make a reasoned decision:-

Why?

Are the agents receiving a kickback or referral payment from the firm concerned? Using a firm in cahoots with an estate agency inevitably leads to a potential conflict of interest. Will such firm be working in your best interests or simply those of the introducer? Here at Maples we pride ourselves on being completely independent and we consider the idea of a referral fee both abhorrent and unethical. We much prefer to obtain our work based on past performance and recommendation.

How Much?

Do not be misled by a seemingly attractive basic figure initially quoted but be sure to enquire about and read the small print for add ons for so called “extras” (such as mortgage costs, preparation of a stamp duty land tax return, telegraphic transfer fees and the like) which suddenly spring up at a later date and only become apparent in the firm’s final statement. Ensure that you are comparing like for like. Here at Maples, we give you a complete and all inclusive rundown of our professional charges and all disbursements at the outset, with no hidden extras.

Where?

Is the firm local or, as is more likely, based in a completely different part of the country? If the latter, then the transaction will, without a doubt, be dealt with by post, phone or email and lack any personal contact. Here at Maples we are fully accessible, like to meet our clients to discuss and advise upon the transaction face to face and share with you the benefit of our wealth of local knowledge and experience.

Who?

Will you actually be aware as to who will be dealing with the matter for you or will you simply be a reference or matter number at the end of a phone in a firm dealing with volume conveyancing? Here at Maples, you will be assigned to your own experienced and dedicated conveyancer who will be responsible for and deal with the transaction for you from beginning to end, with a high level of personal service throughout.

Making a hasty and bad appointment could seriously prejudice or delay your transaction and cost you dearly. Getting honest answers to these four simple questions at the outset could make all the difference.

To discuss any Conveyancing matters please contact either Claire Smith or Anita Zaborniak of our Conveyancing Team or telephone the office 01775 722261.

Read More

Testimonials

Gemma Mayer LLB

"I would highly recommend Maples Solicitors, especially Gemma Mayer, for any conveyancing work. The level of support and professionalism was excellent at all times. I also felt if I needed to ask or clarify anything that it was not an issue. Buying and selling a house is stressful enough, but Gemma helped me through it step by step."

Anita Toal LLB BA

"I think you are brilliant. You can use my comments above. You are efficient, friendly and quite clearly very good at what you do. Mainly you don’t leave people hanging around too long for." "So easy to talk to her and she understood what I wanted. She put me at ease and I cant thank her enough"

Daven Naghen LLB

"I felt the service I got from Maples was excellent and was very honest all through the process. I would recommend Maples as a first class Solicitors group"

Faye Blair LLB

Faye was excellent, sensitive and acted very well to the time constraints we faced. Great service and dealt with compassion at such sad times made the process less painful very professional.

Jamie Dobbs ACILEx

Over the last forty years I have cause to deal with many law firms both in a personal and professional capacity, including some ‘top’ London Companies. In all of those dealings I have never found anyone as proactive and so willing to offer help and advice as Jamie Dobbs. During the last two years Jamie guided my parents through the completion of Lasting Powers of Attorney. Helped myself with the use of the LPA and recently dealing with Probate and Estate Administration following their death.

Mike Pepper MA

This is the second time we have used Mike Pepper at Maples Solicitors in the sale of our house. We cannot praise Mike enough for the highly efficient and professional service that he has provided us with. He is by far the best solicitor we have ever worked with, and the service that he has provided us with has gone far and beyond anything we have ever experienced. We have found the whole process to be a very relaxing experience.

Claire Smith FCILEx

Claire Smith has been amazing in every way. I highly recommend her and I am so grateful for all her help. She’s professional on all levels, reliable, extremely organised and I will be recommending her to everyone. I’m very lucky to have had her representing me and I can’t thank her enough. She is an asset to Maples. Thanks so much Claire!

Anita Zaborniak

We found it a pleasure to deal with Anita Zaborniak, she was most helpful and informative and kept us up to date with the progress of the purchase of our new home. If we were to move again we wouldn’t hesitate to use Maples again.