A Case on Dismissal for Refusing a Pay Cut

25th October 2011
A Case on Dismissal for Refusing a Pay Cut image

A Case on Dismissal for Refusing a Pay Cut

Frequently, especially in current economic conditions, Employers will want to know if they can cut costs by reducing the wages of its staff.  There is no hard and fast answer but a recent Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decision in Garside and Laycock Limited –v- Booth gave some guidance for Employers in this situation.

Here Garside and Laycock Limited sought to avoid redundancies by cutting its work force’s salary by 5%.  Booth refused to accept the pay cut, and was dismissed as a result.  He claimed unfair dismissal, which the Employment Tribunal initially upheld upon the basis that it was reasonable for him to maintain his pay and conditions.  His employers appealed.

The EAT held that the Tribunal at first instance had erred in law.  Firstly it had wrongly considered the reasonableness of the Employee’s decision to reject the pay cut rather than whether the Employer was reasonable to dismiss the Employee for not accepting it.  Secondly the Tribunal had wrongly considered whether or not a dismissal for refusing a pay cut was fair depended upon whether or not the Employer was so desperate that the only way of salvaging the business was to propose cuts in pay and conditions.

The EAT sent the case back to the Tribunal for a fresh hearing, but gave guidance on the correct approach.  It said that the Tribunal must look at the circumstances (including the size and resources of the Employer) to see if it was reasonable to treat the refusal to agree a contractual variation as sufficient to dismiss the Employee.  At the same time the Tribunal should consider whether the dismissal was made in “accordance with equity”.  The EAT felt that this may be relevant if a management proposed to cut its own workers’ pay but not its own.  Similarly the process by which a pay cut was negotiated may be relevant where a Tribunal considers that it runs contrary to equity’s sense of fair dealing.

Daven Naghen, head of the Employment Team, commented as follows:-

“Dismissing an employee for refusing a pay cut or contractual variation is often a tricky issue.  If an employer is going to do this fairly, then it must be reasonable in the circumstances to treat the refusal of the employee as sufficient to dismiss.  If for example a pay cut is proposed, the management have agreed to take a pay cut, the pay cut is necessary in order to keep the business afloat and the staff were involved in a consultation process – then there is a reasonable chance that a dismissal of an employee in these circumstances for refusing the pay cut may be fair.  Each case will depend upon its own circumstances and no employer should ever dismiss an employee for refusal to accept a contractual variation without first seeking legal advice.”

If you require advice on this matter then please contact either Daven Naghen on 01775 722261, daven.naghen@maplessolicitors.com or at 23 New Road, Spalding, Lincolnshire PE11 1DH or Gemma Mayer on 01775 722261, gemma.mayer@maplessolicitors.com or at 23 New Road, Spalding, Lincolnshire PE11 1DH.


Dementia Friends image

Dementia Friends

Maples Solicitors are proud to announce that they have now joined to become Dementia Friends which is an Alzheimer’s Society initiative.

The private client department of Maples Solicitors prepare Wills and Lasting Powers of Attorney on a regular basis and this often involves dealing with clients who are suffering from dementia. The private client team pride themselves on spending as much time as is necessary to assist all of their clients, but those suffering from dementia often require additional assistance and time to ensure that they have fully understood the legal documentation that they are creating. The private client department are regularly complimented on the way they deal with such clients, whether this be explaining things to them in a clear and uncomplicated manner, spending time with them or putting them at ease.

It is a misconception that anyone suffering from dementia cannot make a Will or Lasting Power of Attorney. Only if someone lacks sufficient mental capacity are they unable to make such a document. It is therefore vitally important upon any diagnosis of dementia that legal advice is taken as soon as possible to make sure that your affairs are in order so that it is easier for your family to deal with your affairs if you are unable to do so yourself.

To become Dementia Friends, Maples Solicitors have pledged to develop their understanding of dementia and continue assisting clients suffering from dementia with their legal affairs in a respectful, friendly and efficient way that is not daunting making the process as easy as possible.

Read More

Testimonials

Gemma Mayer LLB

"I would highly recommend Maples Solicitors, especially Gemma Mayer, for any conveyancing work. The level of support and professionalism was excellent at all times. I also felt if I needed to ask or clarify anything that it was not an issue. Buying and selling a house is stressful enough, but Gemma helped me through it step by step."

Anita Toal LLB BA

"I think you are brilliant. You can use my comments above. You are efficient, friendly and quite clearly very good at what you do. Mainly you don’t leave people hanging around too long for." "So easy to talk to her and she understood what I wanted. She put me at ease and I cant thank her enough"

James Turner BA

James Turner was extremely helpful with our buying process. Everything went smoothly. We are very happy with the level of professionalism demonstrated by the office. Highly recommended solicitors. Will definitely do business with them again.

Daven Naghen LLB

"Daven provided an excellent service, from attending the first interview with me to the final court appearance. He filled me full of confidence that he would defend me to which he did and come out with an excellent outcome in view of my position that I had put myself in."

Faye Blair LLB

Faye was excellent, sensitive and acted very well to the time constraints we faced. Great service and dealt with compassion at such sad times made the process less painful very professional.

Jamie Dobbs GCILEx

Over the last forty years I have cause to deal with many law firms both in a personal and professional capacity, including some ‘top’ London Companies. In all of those dealings I have never found anyone as proactive and so willing to offer help and advice as Jamie Dobbs. During the last two years Jamie guided my parents through the completion of Lasting Powers of Attorney. Helped myself with the use of the LPA and recently dealing with Probate and Estate Administration following their death.

Mike Pepper MA

Mike Pepper gave us excellent advice. He was always most helpful and accommodating giving lucid explanations every step of the way. Thank you Mike.

Donna Sandison FCILEx

Donna has been helpful and professional every step of the way during the process. Always on hand to answer any queries and totally professional and friendly at all times.