Employment Law

The Government/Employee Owner Contracts image

The Government/Employee Owner Contracts

25th March 2013

In October 2012 the Government launched a consultation on its proposal for a new type of contract of employment of “employee-owner”, under which employees would be given shares in exchange for waiving certain employment rights.

Under these proposals a new tier of employment status would be created namely employee-owners who would receive shares of between £2,000 and £50,000 (exempt from Capital Gains Tax) in return for giving up specified employment rights (such as ordinary unfair dismissal). 

In December the Government published its response for the consultation, and despite mixed views from those taking part in the consultation, it wishes to proceed albeit with certain modifications.  For example the employee-owner contract will be renamed “employee-shareholder” contract and the upper limit of shares (£50,000) will be removed (but will remain for Capital Gains Tax exemption).  Amendments will be made to the Growth and Infrastructure Bill accordingly.  The Government is also set to issue guidance on these laws and the tax consequences of “employee-shareholder” contracts.  In particular the Government acknowledges that there is already uncertainty amongst employers as to the differences between the two existing types of employee status of workers and employees, and that adding a new status of employee-shareholder with different rights again could add further to the confusion. 

Daven Naghen, head of our Employment Team, commented as follows:-

“I don’t know yet whether the new scheme will be workable in practice, more information and detail is going to be required.  Watch this space!”

If you want to keep up to date with developments on employee-shareholder contracts then stay subscribed to our Employment Newsletter

Read More
A Case on Restrictive Covenants image

A Case on Restrictive Covenants

25th March 2013

Employment Contracts often contain what are known as restrictive covenants.  Businesses seek to impose such restrictive covenants in order to try and prevent or limit a departing employee from doing such things as setting up in competition, working for a competitor, enticing away staff and soliciting customers and suppliers.

The restrictive covenant must be reasonable, in that it can only go so far as reasonably protecting a legitimate interest of the business and should not be used to stop departing members of staff from working.  As a result it is always important to get legal advice on such clauses, to try and ensure that they are reasonable or otherwise if they are found to be unreasonable then they will be void and have no effect whatsoever. 

An interesting case on restrictive covenants from the end of last year (2012) was Pat Systems –v- Neilly, which was determined by the High Court. 

Mr Neilly joined Pat Systems in 2000 as a junior salesman.  His original contract included a restrictive covenant stating that for twelve months after leaving the company he could not join a competitor.  In 2005 Mr Neilly was promoted to director of global accounts, a senior position.  Upon promotion he signed a letter that increased his salary and notice period.  The letter also included an acknowledgement that all other terms and conditions in his contract would remain unaltered.

In 2012 Mr Neilly resigned giving three months’ notice, and informed Pat Systems that he intended joining a company that Pat Systems regarded as a competitor. 

In response Pat Systems dismissed him without notice for a serious anticipatory breach of contract. 

The High Court considered that at the time Mr Neilly entered the contract in 2000 that it was quite clearly the case that the clause was void as it was unreasonable to impose a 12 month restriction on a junior salesman. 

However Pat Systems argued that the contract had been entered into in 2005 when Mr Neilly got promoted, upon the basis of his acknowledgement that all other terms remained unchanged. 

The High Court ruled that an acknowledgement was insufficient, and that Mr Neilly either needed to sign a new contract (including the covenant) or he needed to sign a fresh indication of acceptance of the existing covenant.

Daven Naghen, head of our Employment Team commented as follows:-

“This highlights the need for businesses to ensure that employees sign a new contract every time there is a change in role or a promotion.  Had Pat Systems done so in 2005 when Mr Neilly was promoted, then this probably would have prevented Mr Neilly from joining a competitor for 12 months as a 12 month restriction would probably have been deemed reasonable for the position he had acquired in 2005.”

If you need advice on restrictive covenants or any issues in respect of drafting contracts then please contact Daven Naghen on 01775 722261 or email daven.naghen@maplessolicitors.com or write to Dav at 23 New Road, Spalding, Lincolnshire PE11 1DH.

Read More
Default Retirement Age Abolished image

Default Retirement Age Abolished

25th March 2011

The Government has confirmed that it will abolish the Default Retirement Age (DRA) from October 2011. The process will begin in April 2011. This has been welcomed by some who say this will protect against ageism. It also has the advantage of keeping experienced valuable workers in the workplace. They, in turn, can pass on their knowledge and experience to others. In 2009, it was estimated that 100,000 workers were forced to retire.

The law should evolve and change to reflect the social and economic changes in society. The Equality and Human Rights Commission already argue that a compulsory retirement age is discriminatory. The change in the law will hopefully lead to a change in people’s views about retirement and shift away from the current ‘countdown culture’.

Some people in the 60’s do not relish the prospect of retirement and enjoy the social and financial benefits of remaining in employment.

The current law is contained in the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006. Under the provisions it allows employers to force employee’s retirement at the age of 65. This is arguably an arbitrary and unfair rule. The only statutory procedure in place is that notice must be given to the employee 6 months before reaching the age of 65 of a meeting with their employer. At the end of the meeting it is entirely at the discretion of the employer as to whether he will terminate the employment. Legally there is no redress for the employee.

The changes mean that people over 65 will have full employment law rights for the first time.  The regulations are expected to take effect from 6 April 2011. From the 6 April employers will no longer just be able to give notice of a meeting. Notice made prior to 6 April will be valid on the condition retirement must take place before the 1 October 2011.

For Employers the choices are that either they end the traditional retirement age, or keep it on the basis that they can objectively justify it. The statutory notice and consultation procedure will be abolished as well. ACAS has published guidance for employers on the changes titled: ‘Working without the Default Retirement Age’. Businesses have raised concerns about the effect this will have on them.

Another aspect of this of course is that it will help public finances, in the fact that employees will be paying tax and putting off claiming their state pension. Under such austere economic times, the ageing population places a strain on Government resources. An ageing, working population could potentially save the Government £3.5 billion a year.

For advice for your business on retiring a member of staff please contact Daven Naghen on daven.naghen@maplessolicitors.com or 01775 722261.

Read More
The BBC Loses Discrimination Case image

The BBC Loses Discrimination Case

25th March 2011

Recently an Employment Tribunal found in favour of Miriam O’Reilly’s claim against the BBC based upon the grounds of age and sex discrimination.  Miss O’Reilly (51 years of age) was a presenter on the BBC programme Countryfile, but she lost her job to a younger woman (Julia Bradbury aged 40).  The older male presented (John Craven aged 68) was retained.  The BBC had moved the show to a more “prime-time” slot and as part of a “make over” Miss O’Reilly lost her job.

The evidence presented on Miss O’Reilly’s behalf included reference by her colleagues to her wrinkles and her grey hair.

In its defence the BBC claimed it wanted to ensure that its presenters reflected the diversity of its audience.  The Tribunal however held that it had acted unlawfully in putting too much emphasis on youth.

Daven Naghen, head of our Employment Team commented as follows:-

“This case actually highlights the provisions in the new Equality Act 2010, which says that claims can be brought on a basis of combined characteristics.  These provisions are not yet in force, but will allow an employee to identify any two of the protected characteristics (e.g. sex, age, race, disability, gender reassignment, religion or belief, marriage/civil partnerships and pregnancy/maternity) in order to allege discrimination arises because of the particular combination and not because of one of the protected characteristics in isolation.

Hence when these new provisions come into force claims like Miss O’Reilly’s will be even stronger as they can be expressed as arising from the combination of two protected characteristics (e.g. as in this case age and sex) rather than from either of these alone.

If you need advice about the Equality Act 2010 and/or discrimination claims then please contact Daven Naghen on 01775 722261 or daven.naghen@maplessolicitors.com.

Read More
The Right to Request Flexible Work to be Extended image

The Right to Request Flexible Work to be Extended

25th March 2011

On 6th April 2011 the right to request flexible working will be extended to parents of children under 18.

This right currently applies to employees who have had 26 weeks’ continuous employment before applying and have not made an application to work flexibly under the right during the past 12 months and:-

(i)              have or expect to have parental responsibility of a child aged under 17 or,

(ii)             have or expect to have parental responsibility of a disabled child under 18 who receives Disability Living Allowance or

(iii)            the parent/guardian/special guardian/foster parent/private foster carer or as the holder of a residence order or the spouse, partner or civil partner of one of these and are applying to care for the child or

(iv)           are a carer who cares, or expects to be caring, for an adult who is a spouse, partner, civil partner or relative; or who although not related to the applicant lives at the same address as the applicant.

This move to extend the right to parents of children under 18 is the first stage of changes to the law that will eventually extend the right to request flexible working to all employees.

Under the present law a business must seriously consider the application, and only reject it if there are good business reasons for doing so.  The employee only has the right to ask for flexible working, not the right to have it.

Good business grounds for refusing an application can include the burden of additional costs, the detrimental effect on the ability to meet customer demand, the inability to reorganise work amongst existing staff, the inability to recruit additional staff, the detrimental impact on quality, the detrimental impact on performance, the insufficiency of work during the periods the employee proposes to work and the planned structural changes.

Daven Naghen, head of our Employment Team, commented as follows:-

“Employers will need to take care to update flexible working policies and procedures to cover this slight change to the rules.  Currently the statutory right is just a right to request flexible working, and is not a right to have it.  Therefore employers can still reasonably decline applications if there is a legitimate business ground for doing so.

Those employees who do not have the statutory or legal right to request flexible working are still free to ask their employer if they can work flexibly.  It will be a matter for the business as to whether or not it is willing to consider such a request – it may be good employment practice to do so.”

If you require advice about dealing with an application by a member of staff for flexible working then please contact Daven Naghen on 01775 722261 or email daven.naghen@maplessolicitors.com

Read More
Employment Changes in 2011 image

Employment Changes in 2011

25th March 2011

There will be many changes for businesses to be aware of this year in the world of employment.  The main ones are summarised below:-

February 2011

  • A week’s pay will rise from £380 to £400 (used to calculate for example redundancy payments).
  • The maximum compensatory award for unfair dismissal claims will rise from £65,300 to £68,400.
  • Guarantee pay increases from £21.20 per day to £22.20 (paid in certain circumstances when an employee is laid off by his employer).

April 2011

  • The phasing out of the Default Retirement Age (65) will begin from 6 April. This means that employers will not now be automatically able to retire employees by simply giving them 6 months’ notice.  For further details see our article below by Helen O’Leary.
  • There will be a Limit on migration from non European Countries which will apply from 1 April.
  •  Additional paternity leave. This allows the father (or mother’s partner) to take part of the mother’s maternity leave so as to allow the mother to return to work, up to 26 weeks in the first year of the children’s life.  In the case of adoption, within the first year of adoption. They may also be entitled to additional paternity pay. This will effect parents whose child is born on or after 3 April 2011 or who are matched for adoption with a person who is notified of the match on or after 3 April 2011.
  • New rates of Statutory Maternity pay Statutory Adoption pay, Statutory Paternity pay and Statutory Sick pay from the 3 April 2011. The first three will increase from £124.88 to £128.73 per week. Statutory Sick pay will increase from £79.15 to £81.60 per week. The weekly earning threshold for these first three will also increase from £97 to £102.
  • The Single Equality duty Introduced. The Equality Act 2010 replaces the current public sector duties to promote equality with a single equality duty. This will oblige public authorities to have regard for the need to eliminate discrimination, harassment, victimisation and other prohibited conduct. This will take effect on the 6 April 2011.
  • There will be a public holiday on 29 April 2011 to mark the marriage of Prince William and Kate Middleton!!
  • The basic state pension rate will increase as well as benefit payments in line with the consumer price index.
  • The right to request flexible working will be extended to parents of children under 18 from the 6 April 2011 (see article below by Grant Shackleston for more details).
  • Increase in personal tax allowance and national insurance contributions for employees. The personal allowance for income tax is increased by £1,000 for employees under the age of 65 from the 6 April 2011.

June 2011

  • Transnational Information and Consultation of Employees (Amendment) Regulations 2010 which implement the recast European Works Council Directive  2009 are due to come into force partially on 5 June.

October 2011

  • The Agency Workers Regulations 2010 are due to come into force October 2011. Temporary agency workers in the UK will receive equal treatment comparable to permanent employees after twelve weeks in a job.
  • It is likely the Government will change around this time the national minimum wage after a period of consultation.

Employment related matters:

  • The Government intend to change the benefits system. They aim to simplify the benefits to give “one universal credit”.  No law has been passed yet, it is still in the early stages.

If you need advice or assistance on any of these forthcoming changes then please do not hesitate to contact a member of our Employment Team.

 

Contact Daven Naghen on daven.naghen@maplessolicitors.com or 01775 722261

Read More
Coffee Morning and Pop-Up Clinic image

Coffee Morning and Pop-Up Clinic

Join us at The Ruby Hunt Centre, Church Street, Donington, PE11 4UA on Monday 11th March 2024 between 10am and 12pm for a free coffee morning and pop-up clinic to talk about Wills, Powers of Attorney and financial planning for Care Homes.

If you cannot join us for the coffee morning, please contact one of our lawyers in the Wills and Probate Department to discuss a home visit.

Or telephone the office 01775 722261 and ask to speak with one of the team.

We look forward to seeing you there.

Read More

Testimonials

Jamie Dobbs FCILEx

"I should like to take this opportunity to express my very sincere and grateful thanks for Jamie's unfailing helpfulness and efficiency in all aspects of the handling of my late stepmother's estate. Jamie have always replied to my (many!) queries promptly and comprehensively which has been a enormous help throughout what I know can be a fraught and stressful process. Sadly, it is increasingly rare these days to experience the highs standards of service that Jamie has provided."

Gemma Mayer LLB

"I would highly recommend Maples Solicitors, especially Gemma Mayer, for any conveyancing work. The level of support and professionalism was excellent at all times. I also felt if I needed to ask or clarify anything that it was not an issue. Buying and selling a house is stressful enough, but Gemma helped me through it step by step."

Anita Toal LLB BA

"I think you are brilliant. You can use my comments above. You are efficient, friendly and quite clearly very good at what you do. Mainly you don’t leave people hanging around too long for." "So easy to talk to her and she understood what I wanted. She put me at ease and I cant thank her enough"

James Turner BA

James Turner was extremely helpful with our buying process. Everything went smoothly. We are very happy with the level of professionalism demonstrated by the office. Highly recommended solicitors. Will definitely do business with them again.

Daven Naghen LLB

"Daven provided an excellent service, from attending the first interview with me to the final court appearance. He filled me full of confidence that he would defend me to which he did and come out with an excellent outcome in view of my position that I had put myself in."

Faye Blair LLB

Faye was excellent, sensitive and acted very well to the time constraints we faced. Great service and dealt with compassion at such sad times made the process less painful very professional.

Jamie Dobbs GCILEx

Over the last forty years I have cause to deal with many law firms both in a personal and professional capacity, including some ‘top’ London Companies. In all of those dealings I have never found anyone as proactive and so willing to offer help and advice as Jamie Dobbs. During the last two years Jamie guided my parents through the completion of Lasting Powers of Attorney. Helped myself with the use of the LPA and recently dealing with Probate and Estate Administration following their death.

Mike Pepper MA

Mike Pepper gave us excellent advice. He was always most helpful and accommodating giving lucid explanations every step of the way. Thank you Mike.

Donna Sandison FCILEx

Donna has been helpful and professional every step of the way during the process. Always on hand to answer any queries and totally professional and friendly at all times.